Mudsock Heights

Mudsock Heights

Illustration Credit: Timothy R. Butler/Stable Diffusion XL

Fauci Ouchie . . . and More

By Dennis E. Powell | Posted at 3:00 PM

With every new disclosure we learn of some new falsehood told us about the creation, effects, and supposed control of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the COVID-19 disease it causes, and the stuff that was marketed as a “vaccines.”

This week we learned a lot more. Not the least is that if you count Anthony “Gollum” Fauci among your friends, you can be expected to take the fall for his malfeasance, because he’ll admit nothing, ever, and if he can he’ll pin it all on you.

Which we’ll get to in a bit, but first, we’ve now seen the most stunning evidence so far that the “vaccines” promulgated by pharmaceutical companies (with their government mouthpieces urging — often requiring — citizens to be injected with those products) are in and of themselves harmful. It comes in the form of a study (pdf) published Monday in BMJ Public Health which strongly suggests that the “vaccines” have killed millions of people. I have yet to see evidence that the “vaccines” saved a single life.

I confess a personal interest in this. One of my best friends, “vaccinated” to the eyebrows, went the hospital for a digestive disorder. It was cured, but he was sent to “rehabilitation” where he immediately contracted COVID-19 and was dead in three days. I’ve written about it.

Another good friend, younger, more prudent in his habits, and generally healthier than I am, got fully “vaccinated” — and spent two weeks in the hospital suffering from COVID-19, within shouting distance of death.

The mother of a dear friend overseas was a cancer survivor, cancer-free for years. She believed what her doctors and her government told her and got vaccinated. Her cancer immediately re-erupted and she was soon dead.

The wife of a friend of mine of many decades, always in perfect health, got vaccinated, and soon thereafter felt poorly. She went to the doctor and found that her body had virtually exploded in cancer and she quickly died.

The researchers who conducted the study discovered that while excess mortality — more people than expected dying — caused by COVID-19 has gone down, excess mortality in general has not dropped as much as it should have. They think the “vaccine” itself may be to blame.

“Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, excess mortality includes not only deaths from SARS-CoV-2 infection but also deaths related to the indirect effects of the health strategies to address the virus spread and infection,” they wrote. “. . . Although COVID-19 containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines were thus implemented to protect citizens from suffering morbidity and mortality by the COVID-19 virus, they may have detrimental effects that cause inferior outcomes as well.”

The pharmaceutical companies want you to think that side effects are rare. Not so, said the researchers. “Although COVID-19 vaccines were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the COVID-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well. The secondary analysis of the placebo-controlled, phase III randomised clinical trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines showed that the Pfizer trial had a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group. The risk difference was 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated. . . . The Moderna trial had a 6% higher risk of serious adverse events among vaccine recipients. The risk difference was 7.1 per 10,000 vaccinated.

“By definition, these serious adverse events lead to either death, are life-threatening, require inpatient (prolongation of) hospitalisation, cause persistent/significant disability/incapacity, concern a congenital anomaly/birth defect or include a medically important event according to medical judgement.

“The authors of the secondary analysis point out that most of these serious adverse events concern common clinical conditions, for example, ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome and brain haemorrhage. This commonality hinders clinical suspicion and consequently its detection as adverse vaccine reactions.

“Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World, such as VAERS in the USA, EudraVigilance in the European Union and Yellow Card Scheme in the UK. A study comparing adverse event reports to VAERS and EudraVigilance following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines versus influenza vaccines observed a higher risk of serious adverse reactions for COVID-19 vaccines. These reactions included cardiovascular diseases, coagulation, haemorrhages, gastrointestinal events and thromboses.”

(Wouldn’t it be a horrifying irony if my friend who died of COVID-19 got the stomach problem that led to his hospitalization and exposure to the COVID-19 disease and his death . . . because of the “vaccine”? We know that the “vaccine” was of little or no use in preventing the disease itself.)

“The Food and Drug Administration noted in July 2021 that the following potentially serious adverse events of Pfizer vaccines deserve further monitoring and investigation: pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation. [Your blood turning to jello.]” Yet the government continued to press for “vaccination,” made it mandatory for the military, and encouraged industry and businesses to do the same.

Download and read the study. It will make you angry.

There’s been only a little research so far — though certainly more than was conducted before the deadly “vaccines” were turned loose on a population encouraged and sometimes forced to submit to them — but what we do have is damning. The whole subject of “turbo cancer,” as it has come to be called, remains unstudied. Though it has been noted that the medical-industrial complex, in its eagerness to scoop up those sweet, sweet COVID-19 dollars, let its other patients go essentially untreated, leading to even more deaths. Once medicine was entirely about curing patients, but no more.

The day the study was released, in a congressional hearing room Dr. Anthony Fauci, once highly regarded as a scientist, was trying to weasel his way out of his own words.

It was a colorful scene, like an anime in which the evil mastermind is surrounded by deranged clowns. The Democrats on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic generally acted and sounded like PTA presidents handing out a meaningless certificate to this month’s guest speaker.

There were exceptions: For instance, Rep. Kweisi Mfume, Democrat of Maryland, devoted his time to complaining about the admittedly notorious Tuskegee Syphilis Study, in which nearly 400 black men were infected with the venereal disease. However, awful though it was, that study began 92 years ago and ended 52 years ago. Over that time, about 130 men died from the disease or its complications. Unforgivable, but not the same as something that killed many millions of people, this decade, possibly because government health officials paid the Chinese to conduct dangerous experiments — about which those officials, chief among them Fauci, then persistently lied and continue to lie.

The Republicans did better, except for the ridiculous Marjorie Taylor Greene (Idiot — Georgia), who never fails to make an ass of herself. (This time she had a picture of two dogs, about which she screeched before, per usual, getting into an argument with her colleagues.)

By the time Fauci took the witness stand Monday, The New York Times had already cut him loose. On that day it published an opinion piece by the authoritative Dr. Alina Chan entitled “Why the Pandemic Probably Started in a Lab, in 5 Key Points.” Remember that it was not that long ago that the government leaned on all-too-willing (anti)social media to censor any such opinions and ban their authors.

It becomes more and more evident that Fauci lied to us about nearly everything during the pandemic. He accidentally told the truth early on when on March 8, 2020 he said that masks would be of no help, but he soon replaced it with a lie, which came the same day that Moderna announced that the “vaccine” it developed along with Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was more than 94 percent effective, which turned out not to be true.

(I’m reminded of a meme going around last year that depicted World Health Organization head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and his “evolving” position on the vaccines: “May — 95 percent protection. June — 70 percent protection. July — 50 percent protection. August — No protection, but reduces the spread. September — Doesn’t reduce the spread, but reduces severity. October — Doesn’t reduce severity, but reduces hospitalizations. November — Doesn’t reduce hospitalizations, but you aren’t going to die. December — You die, but you go to Heaven.”)

Forbes has a history of Fauci denying that the virus could have originated in the lab. By Monday he claimed an “open mind,” but still tried to say it probably originated in the wild. He is not a disinterested party, in that all evidence suggests that the virus itself was developed with the help of money laundered through the shady Eco Health Alliance after originating in a NIAID grant. So yeah, he does have motive to promote some other theory.

Much has been made of his admission that the widely enforced six-foot “social distancing” was simply made up; it’s now known also to have been useless. The idea may have been to add COVID-19 to the long list of situations and phenomena in which there is political value in seeming to do something while actually doing nothing. Fauci says he doesn’t know where the six-foot thing came from, nor the list of other useless rules that were imposed with no other effect than doing enormous damage to the country, such as closing schools and forcing little children to wear masks. There was no scientific evidence in support of any of it.

Fauci has over more than 20 years written scores of articles with Dr. David Morens, Senior Advisor to the Director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Fauci was the director. But from his testimony Monday Fauci would have us believe he barely knows the guy. Two weeks earlier, Morens testified before the same committee about a pile of emails detailing attempts to cover up Fauci’s involvement in NIAID-financed “gain-of-function” research in China. “What you saw, I believe, with Dr. Morens was aberrancy and an outlier,” said Fauci. Which may be true in the sense that Morens got caught. But at the end of the day, it seems clear that Fauci’s agency was paying the Chinese to try to make corona viruses better at killing people, and that Fauci knew about and signed off on those grants.

It comes down to this: Practically everything you were told by the “authorities” about SARS-CoV-2 virus and its COVID-19 disease was false.

All that really remains to learn is whether the people told us those things were deliberate liars or just very, lethally, stupid.

Dennis E. Powell is crackpot-at-large at Open for Business. Powell was a reporter in New York and elsewhere before moving to Ohio, where he has (mostly) recovered. You can reach him at

Share on:
Follow On:

Start the Conversation

Be the first to comment!

You need to be logged in if you wish to comment on this article. Sign in or sign up here.