[CS-FSLUG] Puppy Linux

[Don Parris]

On 6/28/07, dmc <edoc7 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Without even reading it I can state unequivocally that
> the author is uninformed and must have a personal axe
> to grind.
>
>
> Your response makes me curious.  How could he be uninformed about his own
posts disappearing, or about Puppy's license terms - especially the fact
that they were changed?  Whether he has an axe to grind is another issue
altogether.  Given my own recent experience, and my run-in with Pamela
Jones, I don't put much past anyone.  Penguin Pete struck me as a reasonable
human being until Tux500 occurred.  All of a sudden he made libelous claims
about the campaign and dragged my name through the mud (tried to, anyway).
PJ hasn't responded to any of my e-mails since I wrote that she attacked
Kevin Carmony, and I now have grave concerns about the definition of
editorial neutrality.

If posts are disappearing in a public forum, that's a problem, any way you
stack it.  If the author is lying about his posts disappearing, that's as
much a problem as disappearing posts.  If a moderator, who has more access
to the system logs than I do tells me to prove my posts were deleted, I
would have a problem with that.  There are good and bad people in every
community, near as I can tell.  It always helps to keep that in perspective.

Blessings,
Don
-- 
D.C. Parris
Minister, Editor, Free Software Advocate
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dcparris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ofb.biz/pipermail/christiansource_ofb.biz/attachments/20070704/1cb53bb6/attachment.htm>