[CS-FSLUG] Restoring the Original Bible

[EnzoAeneas]

Amen to that!

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Jon Mark Allen <csfslug at allensonthe.net>wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 20:05, Jason P. Franklin <haronniin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The OT seems to follow the Jewish arrangement and naming for the most
> part.
> >  They don't split Chronicles, Samuel and Kings into 1st and 2nd the way
> > Christians do.  And yea, the prophet thing, though I didn't think the
> Jews
> > really combined them in a single book that way.  I could be mistaken.
> >
> > Jason P. Franklin
> >
>
> Yes, they did.
>
> There's a great lesson on the structure of the Hebrew Bible (our OT)
> at BiblicalTraining.org
>
> http://www.biblicaltraining.org/class/bt201
>
> There is some really interesting stuff about the order of the books.
> And while I do believe it greatly enhances some of my understanding of
> the books and the message they convey, I certainly don't see the order
> we have today as "wrong".  There are some very interesting parallels
> in the order of the Hebrew Bible and the order of the NT, too.
>
> Lessons 3-7 at the link above are very interesting (and are not
> condemning or argumentative) and I believe would be worth your time.
>
> I would love to have a Bible with the original order, but am in no way
> interested in yet another English version.  I would much rather see
> that effort put toward getting the Bible into languages that have no
> version at all.
>
> --
> JM
>
> /* If you haven't found something strange during the day, it hasn't
> been much of a day.
> -- John A. Wheeler */
>
> _______________________________________________
> ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list
> Christiansource at ofb.biz
> http://cs.uninetsolutions.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ofb.biz/pipermail/christiansource_ofb.biz/attachments/20091123/b41872c1/attachment.htm>