[CS-FSLUG] 3 Eternal Destinies not 2

[Keli of Coxsackie]

Yes -  I am sorry you would need a book - the Bible..
That is what we use to base truth on..

Michael

Jon Glass wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Keli of Coxsackie
> <keli at parchmentpress.net> wrote:
>   
>> OR check out the website or pdf I referenced..
>>     
>
> Sorry, but if I need some article or book to understand what you are
> saying, then I would highly doubt the veracity of it. As to what you
> are saying, I see an overly precise attachment to the meaning of
> "righteous" and "holy" which are synonyms. It's splitting hairs, and
> doing violence to Scripture. "There is none righteous, no not one",
> and we can only be declared "righteous" in God's eyes by the blood of
> Christ. All other discussions on this word, and "holy" must begin from
> this. We are both righteous and holy based upon justification.
>
> And you still haven't given any justification to the term "eternal
> nations." Nations, yes, are in the book of the Revelation, but
> "eternal"? In fact, I can't find any references in Accordance where
> "eternal" and "nation" appear within 100 words of each other.... (nor
> the term "eternal" at all in Revelation) I see you confusing the
> millennial kingdom with the new heaven and new earth.
>
>
>