[CS-FSLUG] NI: Evolution backers set up online resource

[Chris Brault]

Indeed,

> Should they move it out of the "theory" catagory
> then?

Their religious devotion to the philosophy of
Darwinism makes them move it from Theory to Science
... but only in their minds; Not in reality.

------------------------------------------------------

> Creationism has trouble in science because it cannot
> be based in experimentation or observation. 

Actually, creationism, as described in the Bible, is a
better fit for the observations made in the field than
evolution. Polonium halo's in granite, helium from
radioactive decay in precambrian diamonds, the
cambrian "explosion" and much, much more.

------------------------------------------------------

> It cannot be disproven, nor can evolution or the 
> big bang be proven.

Indeed, evolution is on it's last gasp. The Big Bang
is already in the emergency room. It's over for
secular scientific explanations. Of course, with a
religious shift (due to a fall of secular culture)
comes the rise of Islam and other false religions ...
and the war begins (the antichrist is now welcome
here).

------------------------------------------------------

> It can belong in the history or philosophy
> departments, but you cannot dig up "let there be 
> light."

This is true. No way to prove it that way.

Gabe Ginorio

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com