[CS-FSLUG] Some news

[David M.]

On Friday 09 July 2004 03:29 pm, @ndrew wrote:
> > There is no clock setting for any type of RAM. DRAM, EDO
> > DRAM, SDRAM and so on and so forth.
> >
> >From the manual for the motherboard:
>
> "DRAM Clock at Next Boot is: this fiel supports the capability of setting
> the memory modules clocks that you can use. The choice is either 100MHz,
> 166MHz, 200MHz, 236MHz, 240MHz, 242MHz, 244MHz, 221MHz, 249MHz."
>
> This is an independent setting of the _host_ clock, ie. the CPU clock. So,
> tell me, am I imagining this or something?

No your not imagining. : -) I was thinking of the bus width. Im sorry my 
confusion got you confused. 

>
> --
> @ndrew
> andrew at dothedrew.net
> http://www.dothedrew.net
>
> "No amount of genius can overcome
> a preoccupation with detail."
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christiansource-bounces at ofb.biz
> > [mailto:Christiansource-bounces at ofb.biz] On Behalf Of David M.
> > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 12:15 PM
> > To: A Christian virtual Free Software and Linux Users Group.
> > Subject: Re: [CS-FSLUG] Some news
> >
> > On Friday 09 July 2004 09:23 am, @ndrew wrote:
> > > > There is no memory clock setting, you're probably  refering to
> > > > overclocking the processor.
> > >
> > > Umm.. I believe I was referring to the DRAM clock setting..?
> >
> > There is no clock setting for any type of RAM. DRAM, EDO
> > DRAM, SDRAM and so on and so forth.
> >
> >  I think you are refering to the processors internal clock
> > speed, and maybe the external bus speed, but I can't be sure
> > because of the lack of information you gave.
> >
> > > --
> > > @ndrew
> > > andrew at dothedrew.net
> > > http://www.dothedrew.net
> > >
> > > "No amount of genius can overcome
> > > a preoccupation with detail."
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Christiansource-bounces at ofb.biz
> > > > [mailto:Christiansource-bounces at ofb.biz] On Behalf Of David M.
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:50 AM
> > > > To: A Christian virtual Free Software and Linux Users Group.
> > > > Subject: Re: [CS-FSLUG] Some news
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 08 July 2004 09:49 am, @ndrew wrote:
> > > > > I second Jukka. I've been very, very pleased with the stability
> > > > > provided by Windows XP - when you're using stable hardware
> > > >
> > > > - so I'd be
> > > >
> > > > > reluctant to blame your instability problems on the OS
> >
> > itself. For
> >
> > > > > instance, my brother's been having some problems with
> >
> > his computer
> >
> > > > > running XP (it'll randomly reboot), but it seems to have
> > > >
> > > > been a bad memory clock setting.
> > > >
> > > > > I'd check drivers and settings, etc., and try to diagnose
> > > >
> > > > the problem
> > > >
> > > > > rather than reinstalling XP over and over and over.
> > > >
> > > > 2 things that could be causing the reboots
> > > >
> > > > 1. computer is overheating
> > > > 2. bad memory module.
> > > >
> > > > There is no memory clock setting, you're probably  refering to
> > > > overclocking the processor.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > David M.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list
> > > > Christiansource at ofb.biz
> > > > http://cs.uninetsolutions.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list
> > > Christiansource at ofb.biz
> > > http://cs.uninetsolutions.com
> >
> > --
> > David M.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list
> > Christiansource at ofb.biz
> > http://cs.uninetsolutions.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list
> Christiansource at ofb.biz
> http://cs.uninetsolutions.com

-- 
David M.