[CS-FSLUG] OS/2 Anyone?
Nathan T.
celerate at gmail.com
Sun Apr 6 01:49:29 CDT 2008
Vincent Danen wrote:
>
> Is the 64bit version dramatically different from the 32bit version,
> besides being able to access more RAM? To be honest, I've had not too
> many bad experiences with 64bit Linux, although granted I only really
> use Mandriva so can't speak for the other distros. A few versions ago
> (so a couple years I guess), the 64bit versions were pretty rough, but
> the last year and a half or so I've not noticed a huge difference
> between the two beyond browser plugin compatibility.
>
Honestly, I have no hard information to turn to when I say that the 64
bit version of Vista is better. The only think I can go by is my own
experience. The drivers were all available from manufacturers (except
Palm), and the majority of the software I used was compatible with the
64 bit version of Vista. Honestly though, I had a lot fewer inexplicable
crashes and the computer seemed to run quite a bit faster after I
switched to the 64 bit version.
I won't lie, for that first year Vista was a real pain in the backside
and there are still things that bug me. But honestly I can live with it
and find it more comfortable than Linux. I grew up on Windows after all,
I got into Linux quite a bit later on and the experience was always
accompanied by the trouble of hardware that wasn't fully supported and
the crash report screen in KDE. For those that had the opportunity to
diversify their experiences earlier on, I can see how they would be like
a fish in water using Linux. But for myself I've got a good working
solution to keep my data backed up in Windows, I can keep my computer
secure despite the fact that I'm running Windows, and every piece of
hardware I buy off a store shelf will work with Windows. Linux just
doesn't give me that same sense of stability, half the time I'm not sure
if the backup tool available in Ubuntu is actually making a proper
back-up, or when it last made a proper back-up, and I still can't get it
to work with WPA using a Linksys wireless card.
I guess I should ask myself what exactly I think I'm arguing. I'm not
saying that Microsoft hasn't shot themselves in the foot with Vista, and
I can't say whether they are going to even more damage to themselves
with Windows 7. What I am getting at though, is that a lot of people
point at the resistance facing Vista and act like Microsoft's house of
cards is about to collapse in on them; I just don't see it that way,
eventually people will have to adjust or find themselves a new operating
system to call home, and things will go back to normal until the next
time Microsoft tries to release a new operating system.
On a side note: what the majority of the people in this list describe as
their typical usage of Linux just isn't right for me. I do want to get
away from the farce that is Microsoft's EULA and this whole notion of
licensing software, but Linux as a whole just doesn't feel like a stable
environment to me yet. Ubuntu has come close and that is why I'm running
it on one of my computers; when I feel confident that my files are safe,
that my hardware will work without too much effort, that I have the
software that I need, and that I can carry all that over from one
release to another without loosing anything then I will be happy. That
has happened for some people already, but not for me. I still can't get
Ubuntu to use my NVidia 6200 video card in a dual head configuration,
and I still can't get Ubuntu to connect to my home wireless network
using that Linksys card I purchased quite some time ago. I could
probably get it to work with what some people might call "hacking", but
while I expect that to be possible in well made software, I also expect
it not to be necessary.
More information about the Christiansource
mailing list