[CS-FSLUG] Puppy Linux

[dmc]

Without even reading it I can state unequivocally that
the author is uninformed and must have a personal axe
to grind.

I have been involved with Puppy for quite a while now
and have found the folks there, with RARE exception, to
be friendly and helpful - often unexpectedly generous
with their time and talents.

Perhaps the author has a relationship with another distro
and they are fearful of the growth of Puppy in a Linux
niche they value for their distro?

I can think of no other reasons but uniformed, some personal
animus, or some vested interest in harming Puppy to explain
any effort to poison-pen the good folks involved with Puppy.

We have company so I don't have time to read the article,
may try to later ... doc

> Hi, all (& especially David--aka edoc),
> 
> I just saw this article about Puppy Linux on DistroWatch:
> 
> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20070625#feature
> 
> and was wondering what David's and others' reactions were to his take on 
> the community around Puppy Linux.  (Basically he says that the distro is 
> nice (though not fully GPL), but the community isn't that nice.)
> 
> I was wondering about trying it sometime, but the article soured me on 
> the idea.
> 
> sjm
> 


-- 

Respectfully,  David
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Minister of Discipleship & Education
First Baptist Church of Spring Hill, FL
Personal Site: http://bibleseven.com
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
House & 10 Acres For Sale in Florida:
http://bibleseven.com/steel/cjb-steelhouse-index.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~