[CS-FSLUG] [OT] Fresh Dino Bones

[Chris Brault]

Indeed,
 
> Actually, carbon-14 is less reliable than that even.
> I read a report once in which a piece of shell was
> taken from a live snail with a known age of two
> years and yet a carbon-14 test on the shell fragment
> placed the age of the shell to somewhere around
> 1500BC. I would like to argue that carbon-14 (as
> well as all other radiometric dating techniques) is
> really just guessing with some sort of psuedoscience
> to back it.

Without a doubt, when items of known dates are
checked, there is always a wide gap between reality
and the dating they expect. That's why there's a spot
on the radiometric dating form labeled "Expected
Date." 

-----------------------------------------------------

> I am certain that those who are creationist will be 
> seen as having a world view with supportive
evidence, 
> whilst the "evil"utionists won't have any such REAL 
> evidence (a fairy tale worded in scientific jargon
is 
> still a fairy tale).

Well, in order for the Big Bang to have any hope of
working, you need the copernical principal, dark
matter and dark energy. None of these exist. Evolution
needs mutations that add information on a massive
scale. Nope, not seen, not happening, only information
loss, reshuffling and harmful mutations (you can blame
this on sin).

Gabe Ginorio


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/