[CS-FSLUG] New portscan number

[Tim Young]

According to dshield.org, that port is not probed very often, and there are no
known vulnerabilities for it. And it seems that it is not a standard port for a
trojan.  But there are records of that port being probed for quite some time. 
So it seems like it is not a newly-found backdoor that you need to worry about.

	- Tim Young

"N. Thompson" wrote:
> 
> On September 21, 2004 10:04 pm, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> > According to this: http://www.ivan.nu/stuff/allaportar.asp, it's an
> > unassigned port. I know that doesn't help you much, sorry,
> 
> That just means its not used by a standard internet protocol, it could be used
> for anything, such as to connect to a compromised Windows system with a
> trojan on it for example although there are other possible explanations.
> 
> > On Tuesday 21 September 2004 19:36, Ed Hurst wrote:
> > > Aside from tons of hits on port 445, I have lately seen scans on port
> > > 9342. Any one care to enlighten me on this one?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ChristianSource FSLUG mailing list
> Christiansource at ofb.biz
> http://cs.uninetsolutions.com