[CS-FSLUG] Random comment on comment

[Ed Hurst]

Don Parris wrote:

> Hmmm....   CHADDB's MySQL back-end is not what I would describe as
> "clean" or elegant.  Yet any church could easily deploy it, whether
> they choose to wait for the java front-end, or simply hook it up to
> OpenOffice.org.  The Java front-end will likely add elegance, and if
> well written, bring out or enhance the power of the back-end design. 
> Users could choose between a so-called native interface or web-enabled
> interface.  It's back-end seeks modularity.
> 
> If the front-end proves to be modular, as expected, it will allow for
> ease of maintenance and upgrading.  It will also allow flexibility for
> end-users.  In other words, you could choose which functions you want,
> rather than shoving them down your throat.  Is this more the kind of
> thing you _want_ to hear?
> 
> Don

At least you are making sense. You use terms that have meaning, though I 
frankly know little-to-nothing about databases. The terms like 
"modular", "flexibility" and "ease-of-maintenance" have meaning that is 
pre-defined, or at least made useful in the context.

Yours is a good example.

-- 
Ed Hurst
-----------
A Bible Site -- http://webs.tconline.net/softedges/
Linux & Unix Help -- http://ed.asisaid.com/
Blog -- http://ed.asisaid.com/blog/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]