[CS-FSLUG] Microsoft Church Case Study

Fred A. Miller fmiller at lightlink.com
Fri Jul 15 22:01:59 CDT 2005


On Friday 15 July 2005 9:03 pm, Don Parris wrote:
> Anyone seen this?
> http://www.microsoft.com/resources/casestudies/CaseStudy.asp?CaseStudyID=15
>041
>
> Interesting stuff.  Apparently posted last year prior to the release
> of PitP 1.0.  It appears to me that whoever setup the GNU/Linux
> infrastructure did a really poor job of designing the network.
> Everything they mention (what's the alternative to AD? OES?) is doable
> under GNU/Linux.  And why they were experiencing network intrusions
> can only lead up to the guru not knowing security very well.
>
> I think they replaced the wrong thing.  The church probably should
> have made sure the guy got some classes, or looked for a new IT guru.
> I just don't see why they couldn't have redesigned the infrastructure,
> rather than replace the software.

I couldn't read it all......got sick to my stomach.....it reeks of typical 
lies from MickySoft and to think a church has something to do with them.

Fred

-- 
Planet Earth - a subsidiary of Microsoft. We have no bugs in 
our software, Never! We do have undocumented added 
features, that you will find amusing, at no added cost 
to you, at this time.




More information about the Christiansource mailing list