<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffcc" text="#000000">
There was the solution to my problem! I was blind to search for an
impersonal Truth, an inexorable, merciless entity that holds the
universe in an iron grip. And I was blind to search for Freedom that
was focused on myself so much that would make the rest of the world
irrelevant—and make <i>me</i> irrelevant in the process. Truth was
possible to know only if it was itself a Person; and Freedom was
possible to have only if it was itself a Person. That Person couldn’t
be a mere man—or I would be in slavery. He must be a god, or rather,
God, the Creator of the Universe. And if the Bible was true, then my
problems had one reason: I was a stranger to God, and thus I was a
stranger to Freedom, Ethics, and Justice. I had to come back to Him,
through the redemption He provided in Jesus Christ. Only then I had . .
. <i>everything</i>.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.americanvision.org/article/can-i-be-a-libertarian-without-christ/">http://www.americanvision.org/article/can-i-be-a-libertarian-without-christ/</a>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
This all leads to my belief that I’ve been wrongly defining
liberalism for years. I think a new definition of the liberal
is in order: A liberal is someone who only wants to be free
from the consequences of freedom. -Mike Adams</pre>
</body>
</html>