<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:veritosproject@gmail.com">veritosproject@gmail.com</a> wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:6dcbe5980901011924l59b1363fuaf684dd681388eeb@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2009/1/1 Jonathan E. Brickman <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jeb@joshuacorps.org"><jeb@joshuacorps.org></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">RPM and Deb packaging are to be supported, after the above elements are
working well. They are supported -- but the items all install into
chroots. We might set it up so that a given Debian level is supported in
one large chroot, and a given RH level is supported in another. Using
chroots in this way, we reduce the RPM and Deb packages we support...but for
our primary focus it is more important that we do not risk hosing the system
via bad distro-standard packages, as I have personally done far too many
times for satisfaction.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
What about people's home directories?
Oh wait, we could `mount -o bind /home /chroot/debian/home` or
something of that nature.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Indeed we could. I am not certain we need to protect the system from
the users that much, but it's worth remembering. I am right now
planning on a standard umodified /home tree, until we see reasons
otherwise. Unless you have some specifics right now?????<br>
<br>
J.E.B.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>