[CS-FSLUG] PD: They have started already... HR6257 To Reauthorize the Assault Weapon Ban

[Fred A. Miller]

David McGlone wrote:
> On Sunday 09 November 2008 4:08:18 pm Fred A. Miller wrote:
>> David McGlone wrote:
>>> On Sunday 09 November 2008 10:22:36 am Fred A. Miller wrote:
>>>> Tina Gasperson wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:28 PM, David McGlone <d.mcglone at att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Who in the world would need an AK-47 other than the military anyhow?
>>>>> I recently came to a realization about this whole 2nd amendment thing:
>>>>> it is precisely because the military has these things that it is vital
>>>>> that citizens are legally permitted to have them as well. It may sound
>>>>> "out there" at this point in time to think that the military would
>>>>> ever overtake the citizenry, but it is certainly not out of the
>>>>> question if things ever head in that direction. That, I believe, is
>>>>> the point of the 2nd amendment.
>>>> You are very close! Simply, the reason that NOBama, Kennedy, Biden, and
>>>> ALL other liberals don't want the public armed is that if your desire is
>>>> to be a slave master, you don't want those slaves able to shoot back!
>>>> Liberals can't use the ignorant excuse that all they want to do is save
>>>> lives because ALL the evidence, including stats from the FBI PROVE just
>>>> the opposite - gun control of any flavor DOESN'T work.
>>> Here's what agitates me,
>>>
>>> To me this is not about gun control, this is about placing blame for gun
>>> control squarely on the Democrats. In your original post, you said "The
>>> Democrats have already started",
>>>
>>> If you go back in  history to 1934 When Roosevelt was president,  and
>>> Democrats had majority, the national firearms act of 1934 was largely
>>> enacted to try and help keep firearms out of mobsters hands. Did
>>> Roosevelt and congress have bad intentions? I don't think so.
>>>
>>> Then in 1938 The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 put limitations on selling
>>> firearms. The limitations were prohibiting selling firearms to criminals.
>>> Is this a bad thing? I don't think so.
>>>
>>> Then in 1968 under President Johnson the "Gun control act of 1968" was
>>> enacted to try and keep guns out of criminals hands, kids hands and
>>> people who were incompetent. Were there bad intentions? I don't think so.
>> [snip]
>>
>> I snipped as it's not important.
> 
> Yes it is important. The important thing here is, Your placing blame in the 
> wrong place
> 
>> NO gun control works.... period! 
> 
> I wouldn't know, but that is beside the fact you are blaming this one on the 
> democrats, when it clearly states on the bill that it was proposed and co-
> sponsored by Republicans.
> 
>> I don't care what party proposes it. For sometime, it's been mostly demos. 
>> that have done just that and currently it's almost 100% push from demos,
>> including our new Marxist Pres.
> 
> This is completely untrue. It was Mark Kirk's idea to introduce this bill. 
> That is the bottom line of it, Whether it passes or not, point is a Republican 
> introduced it. This makes your statement "The Democrats are at it again" moot.

He's a RINO. And, it ISN'T moot at all! They have a majority and that's
how it will pass. NEITHER part is guiltless, of course, but the demos.,
being the biggest bunch of Marxists, naturally and deservedly get the
most blame.

Fred

-- 
"Politicians and diapers need to be changed
regularly -- and for the same reason."