[CS-FSLUG] Glorifying having a baby out of wedlock
Stephen J. McCracken
smccrack at hcjb.org.ec
Tue Oct 26 07:23:46 CDT 2004
Aaron Patrick Lehmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:16:46PM -0500, Stephen J. McCracken wrote:
>
>>This is the typical HUMAN viewpoint. To God, sin is sin. A little lie,
>>a little disobediance, a murderer, an adulteror. It is all sin in the
>>eyes of God. If you are a Christian, ALL sin is covered by the blood of
>>Jesus (but read Romans 6 here). If you are not a Christian, does it
>>really matter? Even the little sins will keep you out of heaven (not
>>mentioning the inherated original sin). "Compounding sin"... don't
>>think it matters here (maybe "compounding consequences", but would have
>>to think about that one).
[snip]
> single in evil, from the eyes of those wrronged. In a situation like this, God
> is not the only injured party, just the only divine injured party. In one of
> the hypotheticals, the baby is dead, and in the other it is not.
>
I agree with what you say, but when we are talking about "sin" I think
we are referring to God rathen than people for the most part. That's
why I added "compounding consequences" at the end for the results of the
sin. You will see that I also tried to avert your accusation below by
putting in "**but** read Romans 6 here" in the middle. What does Romans
6 say?
> What you are saying seems to be a twisted version of "Let me sin more, so that
> grace may abound." "Let me sin more, since I'm hellbound anyway."
>
> As an afterthought, is there any way for us to know that Hell is equally bad for
> all sufferers?
Some think so, some think not. We will only know when it's too late to
do anything with the knowledge.
sjm
More information about the Christiansource
mailing list